Tuesday, July 12, 2005

WHERE'S HOLDEN CAULFIELD?

I reread The Catcher in the Rye yesterday.

Relax. No Freudian repression, Marxist alienation, or Kierkegaardian angst; just a couple of thoughts. The last time I read the book I was 30-ish; 20-ish the time before that, etc. It’s always interesting to read a book again when you’re a different person. Catcher at 40. Huh.

One of the scenes that caught my attention, this time around, was Holden’s visit to Ernie’s in Greenwich Village, where a full house was in attendance.

It was pretty quiet, though, because Ernie was playing the piano. It was supposed to be something holy, for God’s sake when he sat down at the piano. Nobody’s that good.[...] I’m not too sure what the name of the song was that he was playing when I came in, but whatever it was, he was really stinking it up. He was putting all these dumb, show-offy ripples in the high notes, and a lot of other very tricky stuff that gives me a pain in the ass. You should’ve heard the crowd, though, when he was finished. You would’ve puked. They went mad. They were exactly the same morons that laugh like hyenas in the movies at stuff that isn’t funny. I swear to God, if I were a piano player or an actor or something and all those dopes thought I was terrific, I’d hate it. I wouldn’t even want them to clap for me. People always clap for the wrong things. If I were a piano player, I’d play it in the goddam closet. Anyway, when he was finished, and everybody was clapping their heads off, old Ernie turned around on his stool and gave this very phony, humble bow. Like as if he was a helluva humble guy, besides being a terrible piano player. It was very phony—I mean him being such a big snob and all. In a funny way, though, I felt sort of sorry for him when he was finished. I don’t think he even knows any more when he’s playing right or not. It isn’t all his fault. I partly blame all those dopes who clap their heads off—they’d foul up anybody, if you gave them a chance.

I guess it reminded me of a new TV show I saw last night—Who Wants to be a Rock Star, or Rock Star Idol, or some such crap. All these young people desperately preening, writhing, and wailing to impress the audience and INXS. Rock and roll sure has changed. It used to give the finger to the machine. Now it's a game show.

Not that pleasing an audience is all bad, but at what point to you become a phony because all you’re doing is playing for the applause?

When do the dopes who clap their heads off become the dope you smoke, the drug you need? When does the music, the painting, the writing, or preaching just become another act of prostitution that scores you round of public approval?

Did I just equate preaching with prostitution? Turn to the scene where Holden is having a pleasant conversation with a couple of nuns, and he’s worried they will ask him if he’s Catholic. “Catholics are always trying to find out if you’re a Catholic.”

He narrates a story about a boy he met at the Whooten School. They discovered they shared an interest in tennis, and started having a meaningful conversation.

Then, after a while, right in the middle of the goddam conversation, he asked me, “Did you happen to notice where the Catholic church is in town, by any chance?” The thing was, you could tell by the way he asked me that he was trying to find out if I was a Catholic. He really was. Not that he was prejudiced or anything, but he just wanted to know. He was enjoying the conversation about tennis and all, but you could tell he would have enjoyed it more if I was a Catholic and all. That kind of stuff drives me crazy. I’m not saying it ruined our conversation or anything—it didn’t—but it sure as hell didn’t do it any good.
Reminded me of a scene from The Big Kahuna, when Phil Cooper (Danny DeVito) is giving a speech to Bob Walker (Peter Facinelli). Phil is telling the young Baptist, Bob, that whenever he starts selling something, whether it's Jesus or industrial lubricants, he ceases to be a human being and becomes a marketing rep.

Because as soon as you lay your hands on a conversation to steer it, it's not a conversation anymore; it's a pitch.

When religion eclipses relationship, it is inevitable that we will become phonies. Our pitch, and making the sale, become more important than the person in front of us.

Maybe it was Holden’s desire for innocence that struck me differently at this point in my life. He keeps dwelling on this lyrical memory he has, until he is corrected by his kid sister.

You know that song, "If a body catch a body comin' through the rye"?...

It's "If a body meet a body coming through the rye"! old Phoebe said. "It's a poem. By Robert Burns."

Here's the part I think I read differently than I had before.

Anyway, I keep picturing all these little kids playing some game in this big field of rye and all. Thousands of little kids, and nobody's around—nobody big, I mean—except me. And I'm standing on the edge of some crazy cliff. What I have to do, I have to catch everybody if they start to go over the cliff—I mean if they're running and they don't look where they're going I have to come out from somewhere and catch them. That's all I do all day. I'd just be the catcher in the rye and all. I know it's crazy, but that's the only thing I'd really like to be.

I've read this as a teenager and as a teacher of teenagers; but, now that I am the father of teenagers, it hurts more. Our children (collectively, not just mine) are indeed running blindly through the rye, ever closer to the cliffs. The six hours of daily digital recess, combined with our increasing willingness to turn them over to media surrogates and drug-dealing peers makes the rye higher and tighter.

Maybe Holden Caufield helped give us the Beats, Dylan, and the various undulating rhythms of counterculture since. So many rhythms that counterculture has become mainstream and "cool" is entirely coopted by corporate marketing.

Maybe Holden Caulfield isn’t possible anymore. Maybe the closest we can get are trust fund punks who go without bathing for a week and sneer at The Man. Then The Man packages that sneer and sells it back to them on cans of body spray and celebrity-endorsed cigarettes.

Maybe Holden Caufield isn’t what we need. He sure as hell wouldn’t want the job. But we do need a Catcher in the Rye.

11 comments:

middleclasstool said...

Sometimes I think the last frontier of rebellion will involve wearing neckties and listening to Perry Como.

In all seriousness, the closest thing I've seen to true rebellion is the "straight edge" kids, who oppose drugs, alcohol, tobacco, or anything that can make someone rich off your dependence. They avoid designer labels and tend to do everything they can to keep their money out of the coffers of major corporations.

And that may be all rebellion is anymore, just staying away from multinationals. It's damn near impossible to do these days.

As to your point about religion, that's a bone of contention Mrs. Tool and I have with our church. The leader of our Sunday School class is trying to get us basically doing telemarketing to try to get bodies in our class, as if the forty-five already enrolled aren't enough. A genuine expression of faith is wonderful, provided it's appropriate in context. Selling JesusCo products is to me even more loathsome than seeing patriotism turned into a brand name.

Anonymous Scout said...

The Navy has a recruiting rock band that came out to the school that I taught at last year. They played a wide variety of music from CCR to Lynard Skynard to Nirvana. I remember thinking that it was pretty remarkable how Uncle Sam was able to take a subversive artform and use it to promote a career that many of the original artists rallied against.

Molly Bandit said...

I never related to Catcher in the Rye, and despite many attempts have never gotten past the first 20 or so pages. If you'd been reading The Great Gatsby, then we could talk. I've always thought of myself as a sort of Nick Carraway.

As for Insta-Rock-Star? *gag* I tuned in tonight because I thought it'd be amusing. I heard one girl butcher the Doors, threw the remote across the room, and retreated to my computer. To paraphrase something much more elegant, I don't even particularly like the Doors, but I'll fight to the death for them. The ad for the show gets to me: "the top unsigned performers..." No. If that had any ring of truth to it, they wouldn't be competing to be the lead singer of a washed-up 80s act on The Real World: Rock N Roll Swindle.

Anonymous said...

Well, old Reacher would have made a decent beat, except he probably would have to "gently" quide the conversation, and I quarantee he would've clapped his head off at phony shit just like everybody else.

MC Tool, maybe it's time to get your own class going. Forty five people is a lecture hall, not a discussion group. Whadda ya gonna do? Just love 'em the best you can and go wash somebody's feet.

Alexis, keep reading old Holden's journal 'til you get it. My favorit scene in Catcher is when Holden is complaining about all the obscene graffiti everywhere he looks and he is worried his sister, old Phoebe, is going to see it. He imagines his grave stone will say something like "Here Lies Holden Caufield.. FUCK YOU"

Beloved said...

OK, i'll try to type this while crossing my fingers... i hate that my comments always seem to bring the meandering to a halt (or maybe i just get in too late... damn McDonaldization)... but the conversations engage me. It's kinda like a fake world where people really actually enjoy talking about something other than sports, or what you did at work today, or for God's sake, the weather!

You know, i just had an epiphany... and it may just pertain to this conversation. Having the "last word" really sucks. i mean, think of all the debates"you've had with people, arguments if you will, dialogues if we're talking "ethical communication" here. Doesn't having the last comment just suck?

Speaking of conversation, i read a book by Brian McLaren, subtitled "Evangelism as Dance." You know, the thought of relationship over religion has challenged, perplexed, and (finally) freed me from my "Fear of Sharing Jesus". What kinda hellish nonsense is that anyway? What kinda person would fear talking about the person they know the best and love the most? Or maybe the don't know the man much at all? Maybe the problem is people are uncomfortable regurgitating religious jargon they've been fed to people they've been told to they're supposed to love.

Reacher brings up an excellent point, and the movie quote is well-taken. But i have to add an optimistic perspective, or the conversation would be incomplete. What about those of us who really do love individuals? Even individuals we just met for the first time? What if the love of Christ really does compel some people to share the greatest gift they've been given? What if some people feel in their deepest being that holding in a secret faith of a God who loves all of humanity and wants to befriend them for eternity is inhumane and hateful? Granted, that's not what you're getting at here. You're assuming that people don't really talk about Christ out of love these days. I'd have to agree that most people don't do that. I think the thing we really need to examine is our love or lack thereof for our fellow neighbors, co-workers, family members, students, teachers, and coffee shop frequenters. And from there, as Mr. McLaren so naturally but eloquently penned it, just dance.
It's sort of a paradox, really. We would be cruel not to tell others what someone graciously told us! If no one told me about the love of Jesus, how would I have ever known? The first half of the title of McLaren's book is "More Ready Than You Realize." It speaks of the fact that most people want to search out spiritual things through relationships. But the key here, is relationships, as i know you all would agree--not relationships for the sake of relationships, but relationships for the sake of love. If you want to live your life for some other reason than to love and be loved, then go for it. I promise you, beyond the shadow of a doubt, there is NOTHING even remotely close to being as satisfying and fulfilling as a life of reciprocal love. Everything else is just apathetic, nihilistic, suicidal madness.

Keep it real.

Anonymous said...

Having the last comment does suck.

Anonymous said...

No, it doesn't.

Anonymous said...

Yeah, you're right.

Anonymous said...

i ran across this while looking up stuff on the catcher in the rye, we're reading it in my 10th grade english class. i'd read it before, so i also got that different perspective. i think a lot of what you wrote is true, but i don't know if we really need a catcher in the rye. i mean, holden tried to be one, but it was on a very small scale. for instance, mark chatman tried to be a catcher in the rye and that went horribly wrong (though it was his interpretation of the book and one can see where that view comes from). kids just need a role model (or a few) and they should be alright. i like what you wrote about the book though, it's good stuff.

Anonymous said...

Good thoughts, Michael. When I was teaching 10th grade English I would have been delighted to have a student like you. Keep reaching.

Anonymous said...

i think rebeliion is more.....finding yourself...the whole reason people rebelled against "the Man" was because it wasn't what they wanted. so rebellion is a selfish way of getting what you want?? I really like the stuff about how the media is turning the punks smirk around and making body spray...it's so true..."rebellion" has become mass marketed as something "cool." The "scene' things of today are the "rebellious" things of yester year...I too am a sophomore reading the book...i love it...i was looking for something analyzing holdens conflicting views on religion in the book, part of my essay, if yall have any ideas lemme know! :)
-an artist